Anthony Romano v Rochester Downtown Hotel, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Romano v Rochester Downtown Hotel, Inc. 2005 NY Slip Op 09953 [24 AD3d 1329] Decided on December 22, 2005 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., KEHOE, MARTOCHE, SMITH, AND PINE, JJ.
1578 CA 05-00775

[*1]ANTHONY ROMANO AND LELA ROMANO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, ORDER

v

ROCHESTER DOWNTOWN HOTEL, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE ASSUMED NAME AND STYLE OF HYATT REGENCY ROCHESTER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. - ROCHESTER DOWNTOWN HOTEL, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE ASSUMED NAME AND STYLE OF HYATT REGENCY ROCHESTER, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, MUN SON, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE ASSUMED NAME AND STYLE OF LION'S BUILDING SERVICE, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), entered December 1, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


MARTIN L. ZIMMERMAN, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
DAMON & MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (JESSE B. BALDWIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 22, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.