Matter of Jerome Laine v Rochester Housing Authority
Annotate this Case
Matter of Laine v Rochester Hous. Auth.
2005 NY Slip Op 09914 [24 AD3d 1329]
Decided on December 22, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 22, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1507 CA 05-01501
[*1]MATTER OF JEROME LAINE, CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ROCHESTER HOUSING AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered September 27, 2004. The order, inter alia, granted claimant's application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
ERNEST D. SANTORO, ESQ., LLP, ROCHESTER (ERNEST D. SANTORO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., BUFFALO (RICHARD P. AMICO OF COUNSEL), BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, FOR CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 22, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on December 22, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1507 CA 05-01501
[*1]MATTER OF JEROME LAINE, CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ROCHESTER HOUSING AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered September 27, 2004. The order, inter alia, granted claimant's application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
ERNEST D. SANTORO, ESQ., LLP, ROCHESTER (ERNEST D. SANTORO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., BUFFALO (RICHARD P. AMICO OF COUNSEL), BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, FOR CLAIMANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 22, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
