People v Robert Lee

Annotate this Case
People v Lee 2005 NY Slip Op 09884 [24 AD3d 1246] December 22, 2005 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Lee, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stephen R. Sirkin, A.J.), rendered December 9, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at the suppression court (Francis A. Affronti, J.). We add only that the record does not support defendant's contention that the sentencing court (Stephen R. Sirkin, A.J.), failed to apprehend the extent of its discretion in fixing the period of postrelease supervision (cf. People v Schafer, 19 AD3d 1133 [2005]; People v Hager, 213 AD2d 1008 [1995]), nor is the period of postrelease supervision unduly harsh or severe. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.