People v Lamont A. Stroman
Annotate this Case
People v Stroman
2005 NY Slip Op 08471 [23 AD3d 1161]
Decided on November 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., MARTOCHE, PINE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1280 KA 04-01994
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
LAMONT A. STROMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 1, 2004. The judgment convicted the defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated.
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (KEVIN T. FINNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, J.P., MARTOCHE, PINE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1280 KA 04-01994
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
LAMONT A. STROMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 1, 2004. The judgment convicted the defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated.
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (KEVIN T. FINNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
