People v Artis Dixon
Annotate this Case
People v Dixon
2005 NY Slip Op 08440 [23 AD3d 1161]
Decided on November 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND PINE, JJ.
1245 KA 03-01415
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ARTIS DIXON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered June 6, 2003. The judgment revoked defendant's probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (SHAWN P. HENNESSY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND PINE, JJ.
1245 KA 03-01415
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ARTIS DIXON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered June 6, 2003. The judgment revoked defendant's probation and imposed a term of imprisonment.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (SHAWN P. HENNESSY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
