Odgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear, LlLPv Isolatek International Corporation
Annotate this Case
Odgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear, Llp v Isolatek Intl. Corp.
2005 NY Slip Op 08399 [23 AD3d 1160]
Decided on November 10, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, MARTOCHE, PINE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1204.2 CA 03-02557
[*1]HODGSON, RUSS, ANDREWS, WOODS & GOODYEAR, LLP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ISOLATEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered May 15, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Isolatek International Corporation for partial summary judgment.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF ROY A. MURA, BUFFALO (ROY A. MURA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (BENJAMIN M. ZUFFRANIERI, JR., OF COUNSEL), PRO SE, AND WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA (EDWARD A. JAEGER, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (ROBERT T. DI GIULIO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT MADER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.
ZDARSKY, SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI, BUFFALO (PATRICK A. DUDLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT BRD, INC.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (BRIAN SUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT ACRES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (CHRISTOPHER D. THOMAS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT CHOPRA-LEE, INC.
EARL W. BRYDGES, JR., LEWISTON, FOR DEFENDANTS LYN DYSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF BIOLYNE, INC., AND BIOLYNE, INC.
DAMON & MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH W. DUNBAR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT ARRIC CORP. Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties and [*2]filed in the Erie County Clerk's Office on September 14, 2005,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 10, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, MARTOCHE, PINE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1204.2 CA 03-02557
[*1]HODGSON, RUSS, ANDREWS, WOODS & GOODYEAR, LLP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
ISOLATEK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered May 15, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Isolatek International Corporation for partial summary judgment.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL F. PERLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICE OF ROY A. MURA, BUFFALO (ROY A. MURA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (BENJAMIN M. ZUFFRANIERI, JR., OF COUNSEL), PRO SE, AND WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA (EDWARD A. JAEGER, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (ROBERT T. DI GIULIO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT MADER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION.
ZDARSKY, SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI, BUFFALO (PATRICK A. DUDLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT BRD, INC.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (BRIAN SUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT ACRES INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.
NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (CHRISTOPHER D. THOMAS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT CHOPRA-LEE, INC.
EARL W. BRYDGES, JR., LEWISTON, FOR DEFENDANTS LYN DYSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF BIOLYNE, INC., AND BIOLYNE, INC.
DAMON & MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH W. DUNBAR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT ARRIC CORP. Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties and [*2]filed in the Erie County Clerk's Office on September 14, 2005,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 10, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
