Anthony P. Hoerner v Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C.

Annotate this Case
Hoerner v Chrysler Fin. Co., L.L.C. 2005 NY Slip Op 07014 [21 AD3d 1253] September 30, 2005 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Anthony P. Hoerner et al., Respondents, v Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants, and Mary P. Rossi, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)

—[*1]Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered March 24, 2004. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., Douglas J. Jank and Jay B. Jank for an order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Hayes, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.