Matter of Gary Barnes v Patricia Mason
Annotate this Case
Matter of Barnes v Mason
2005 NY Slip Op 00690 [15 AD3d 1016]
Decided on February 4, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 4, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
34 CAF 04-00029
[*1]MATTER OF GARY BARNES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
PATRICIA MASON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Marjorie C. Mix, J.H.O.), entered December 19, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed without prejudice the petition seeking custody.
EVELYNE A. O'SULLIVAN, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ALAN BIRNHOLZ, E. AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: February 4, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on February 4, 2005
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
34 CAF 04-00029
[*1]MATTER OF GARY BARNES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
PATRICIA MASON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Marjorie C. Mix, J.H.O.), entered December 19, 2003 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed without prejudice the petition seeking custody.
EVELYNE A. O'SULLIVAN, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ALAN BIRNHOLZ, E. AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: February 4, 2005
JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
