Hazel M. Buck v Volunteer Ambulance Corps of Bath, New York

Annotate this Case
Buck v Volunteer Ambulance Corps of Bath, N. Y. 2003 NY Slip Op 20289 [2 AD3d 1488] Decided on December 31, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., WISNER, KEHOE, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.
1685 CA 03-00176

[*1]HAZEL M. BUCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ERWIN C. BUCK, DECEASED, AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF KATRINA M. BUCK, TIMOTHY C. BUCK, AND BRANDIE L. BUCK, INFANTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ORDER

v

VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS OF BATH, NEW YORK, INC., JAMES HARVEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN OFFICER, SERVANT AND AGENT OF VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS OF BATH, NEW YORK, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)


Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Steuben County (Latham, J.), entered July 1, 2002, which denied plaintiff's motion to settle the record on appeal.


LORENZO & COHEN, BUFFALO (STEVEN M. COHEN OF COUNSEL), AND JOHN VOGEL, DANSVILLE, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
MELVIN & MELVIN, PLLC, SYRACUSE (MICHAEL R. VACCARO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.