Michele Cerra v Syracuse University
Annotate this Case
Cerra v Syracuse Univ.
2003 NY Slip Op 20275 [2 AD3d 1490]
Decided on December 31, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1668 CA 03-00770
[*1]MICHELE CERRA, R.N., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Murphy, J.), entered January 2, 2003, upon a verdict rendered in favor of defendant.
ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (ROBERT E. LAHM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (S. PAUL BATTAGLIA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1668 CA 03-00770
[*1]MICHELE CERRA, R.N., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Murphy, J.), entered January 2, 2003, upon a verdict rendered in favor of defendant.
ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (ROBERT E. LAHM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (S. PAUL BATTAGLIA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
