Matter of Chloe L.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Chloe L.
2003 NY Slip Op 20273 [2 AD3d 1491]
Decided on December 31, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1666 CAF 03-01289
[*1]MATTER OF ADOPTION OF CHLOE L. ORDER AMBER S. AND JOSEPH M., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS; NADINE L. AND DONALD L., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of Family Court, Niagara County (Batt, J.), entered August 29, 2002, which denied without prejudice the application of petitioners to revoke their extrajudicial consents to the adoption of their child.
CLAYTON & BERGEVIN, NIAGARA FALLS (MICHELE G. BERGEVIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.
KATHLEEN E. GAINES, NIAGARA FALLS, FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1666 CAF 03-01289
[*1]MATTER OF ADOPTION OF CHLOE L. ORDER AMBER S. AND JOSEPH M., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS; NADINE L. AND DONALD L., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of Family Court, Niagara County (Batt, J.), entered August 29, 2002, which denied without prejudice the application of petitioners to revoke their extrajudicial consents to the adoption of their child.
CLAYTON & BERGEVIN, NIAGARA FALLS (MICHELE G. BERGEVIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS.
KATHLEEN E. GAINES, NIAGARA FALLS, FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
