Matter of Willie F. Lockett v Laurie M. Stage Myers-Copello
Annotate this Case
Matter of Lockett v Myers-copello
2003 NY Slip Op 20133 [2 AD3d 1492]
Decided on December 31, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ.
1510 CAF 02-02541
[*1]MATTER OF WILLIE F. LOCKETT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
LAURIE M. STAGE MYERS-COPELLO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of Family Court, Chautauqua County (Cass, J.H.O.), entered September 16, 2002, which dismissed without prejudice the petition for an order finding respondent in violation of an order of visitation.
KATHLEEN E. CASEY, MIDDLEPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on December 31, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ.
1510 CAF 02-02541
[*1]MATTER OF WILLIE F. LOCKETT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
LAURIE M. STAGE MYERS-COPELLO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of Family Court, Chautauqua County (Cass, J.H.O.), entered September 16, 2002, which dismissed without prejudice the petition for an order finding respondent in violation of an order of visitation.
KATHLEEN E. CASEY, MIDDLEPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 31, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
