People v Deldrick Bratcher
Annotate this Case
People v Bratcher
2003 NY Slip Op 18751 [1 AD3d 1066]
Decided on November 21, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.
1407 KA 02-01090
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
DELDRICK BRATCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a resentence of Monroe County Court (Geraci, Jr., J.), entered April 15, 2002, resentencing defendant on his conviction for, inter alia, robbery in the first degree.
EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
HOWARD R. RELIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARTHA B. COLBURN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.
1407 KA 02-01090
[*1]PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER
v
DELDRICK BRATCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a resentence of Monroe County Court (Geraci, Jr., J.), entered April 15, 2002, resentencing defendant on his conviction for, inter alia, robbery in the first degree.
EDWARD J. NOWAK, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
HOWARD R. RELIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MARTHA B. COLBURN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
