Liana Toledo v Richard A. Hill

Annotate this Case
Toledo v Hill 2003 NY Slip Op 18663 [1 AD3d 1062] Decided on November 21, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.
1306 CA 03-01108

[*1]LIANA TOLEDO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, ORDER

v

RICHARD A. HILL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.


Appeal and cross appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Carni, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which, inter alia, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL G. DONNELLY, NORTH SYRACUSE (MICHAEL G. DONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
EDWARD Z. MENKIN, SYRACUSE, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing action signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 23, 2003,


It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal and cross appeal be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.