Matter of La Shawn Winthrop v Glenn S. Goord
Annotate this Case
Matter of Winthrop v Goord
2003 NY Slip Op 18622 [1 AD3d 1065]
Decided on November 21, 2003
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.
1261 CA 02-02154
[*1]MATTER OF LA SHAWN WINTHROP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
GLENN S. GOORD, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Dadd, J.), entered July 10, 2002, which dismissed the petition challenging the determination of respondent after a Tier III hearing.
JABBAR WITHROW, ALSO KNOWN AS LA SHAWN WINTHROP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.
1261 CA 02-02154
[*1]MATTER OF LA SHAWN WINTHROP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, ORDER
v
GLENN S. GOORD, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Dadd, J.), entered July 10, 2002, which dismissed the petition challenging the determination of respondent after a Tier III hearing.
JABBAR WITHROW, ALSO KNOWN AS LA SHAWN WINTHROP, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
