Brian Rossman v Paul J. Rossman

Annotate this Case
Rossman v Rossman 2003 NY Slip Op 18617 [1 AD3d 1066] Decided on November 21, 2003 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2003
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.
1256 CA 03-00957

[*1]BRIAN ROSSMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, ORDER

v

PAUL J. ROSSMAN, III, DIANE ROSSMAN, AND PAUL ROSSMAN, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.


Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Boniello, III, J.), entered October 30, 2002, which denied defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.


JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (KIMBERLY E. WHISTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS PAUL J. ROSSMAN, III, AND DIANE ROSSMAN.
CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER, MONTE & PAJAK, P.C., BUFFALO (GREGORY V. PAJAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PAUL ROSSMAN, JR.
VIOLA, CUMMINGS & LINDSAY, LLP, NIAGARA FALLS (KIMBERLY J. LEONCAVALLO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: November 21, 2003JoAnn M. Wahl
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.