Matter of Zi v Burke
Annotate this CaseDecided on September 26, 2017
Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gesmer, JJ.
4518 106/17 -3188] 1932/15
[*1]In re John Kojo Zi, Petitioner-Appellant,
v
James Burke, etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents, Matthew C. Grieve, etc., et al., Respondents.
John Kojo Zi, petitioner pro se.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. James Burke, respondent.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Carey W. Ng of counsel, for Hon. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Carey Ng, respondents.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
ENTERED:
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.