People v Anderson

Annotate this Case
People v Anderson 2017 NY Slip Op 04881 Decided on June 15, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 15, 2017
Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber, Kahn, JJ.
4287 491/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Daquan Anderson, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Samuel L. Yellen of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Eugene Oliver, Jr., J.), rendered February 29, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of six months, concurrent with five years' probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal

(see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094 [2016]), which forecloses review of his suppression claims. The court's oral explanation of the appeal waiver "was sufficient because the right to appeal was adequately described without lumping it into the panoply of rights normally forfeited upon a guilty plea" (People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341 [2015]). Even if there was any ambiguity in the colloquy, defendant executed a detailed written waiver that he discussed with counsel, and which explained that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by pleading guilty. Furthermore, although defendant also pleaded guilty to an unrelated misdemeanor, the court clearly stated that the appeal waiver applied to the felony conviction at issue.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 15, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.