Jenkins v Maggies Paratransit Corp.

Annotate this Case
Jenkins v Maggies Paratransit Corp. 2017 NY Slip Op 04546 Decided on June 8, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 8, 2017
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
4194

[*1]Willie R. Jenkins, 24318/14E Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Maggies Paratransit Corp., et al., Defendants-Respondents.



Kravet, Hoefer & Maher, P.C., Bronx (John A. Maher of counsel), for appellant.

Daniel A. Fried, Yonkers, for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered April 8, 2016, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that a vehicle operated by defendant Chatham made an unsafe lane change. Although eyewitnesses testified that an Access-A-Ride vehicle struck plaintiff's motorcycle, they did not identify the driver. The amended police accident report is inadmissible hearsay, since it was made by a police officer who did not witness the accident (Kajoshaj v Greenspan , 88 AD2d 538 [1st Dept 1982]). Nor does the traffic summons issued to Chatham constitute evidence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 8, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.