Rivera v Columbia Hicks Assoc., LLC

Annotate this Case
Rivera v Columbia Hicks Assoc., LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 04375 Decided on June 1, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 1, 2017
Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.
4163 301377/09 83980/09 84144/12

[*1]Andres Rivera, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Columbia Hicks Associates, LLC, et al., Defendants.



Columbia Hicks Associates LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff,

v

SDS Columbia LLC, et al., Third-Party Defendants.



Columbia Hicks Associates LLC, Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Knockdown Contracting, Inc., Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.



Clausen Miller P.C., New York (Don R. Sampen of the bar of the State of Illinois, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellant.

Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing (F. Jason Kajoshaj of counsel), for Andres Rivera, respondent.

Baker Greenspan & Bernstein, Bellmore (Robert L. Bernstein, Jr. of counsel), for Columbia Hicks Associates LLC, respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered April 6, 2016, which denied second third-party defendant Knockdown Contracting Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing second third-party plaintiff Columbia Hicks Associates LLC's third-party claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly denied Knockdown's motion as untimely, because [*2]Knockdown failed to show "good cause" for moving for summary judgment more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue (CPLR 3212[a]; see e.g. Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 NY3d 725 [2004]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 1, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.