American Express Centurion v Pototschnig

Annotate this Case
American Express Centurion v Pototschnig 2017 NY Slip Op 02895 Decided on April 13, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 13, 2017
Friedman, J.P., Richter, Mazzarelli, Feinman, Gische, JJ.
3709N 108987/08

[*1] American Express Centurion, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Hubert Pototschnig, Defendant-Appellant.



Hubert Pototschnig, appellant pro se.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered October 15, 2015, which denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion granted, the judgment vacated, and the complaint dismissed without prejudice.

In view of plaintiff's counsel's advice to this Court that plaintiff is not opposing this appeal, we reverse and grant defendant the requested relief.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 13, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.