Raia v Pototschnig
Annotate this CaseDecided on March 2, 2017
Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Feinman, Kapnick, Gesmer, JJ.
3322N 113006/09
[*1] Joseph Raia, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v
Hubert Pototschnig, Defendant-Appellant, New Century Mortgage Corporation, et al., Defendants.
Hubert Pototschnig, Woodbury, appellant pro se.
Jeffrey I. Baum & Associates, P.C., Garden City (Jeffrey I. Baum of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered January 5, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant Hubert Pototschnig to reject the report of the referee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The court properly denied defendant's motion, rejecting his attempts to relitigate issues already adjudicated in this action (see Domingez v Zinnar, 130 AD3d 414 [1st Dept 2015]).
Defendant also failed to offer a proposed calculation of interest in response to the court's several requests for him to do so, and the court otherwise afforded defendant ample opportunities to be heard on his objections to the referee's report.
We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 2, 2017
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.