Matter of Brooks v Vance

Matter of Brooks v Vance 2017 NY Slip Op 00448 Decided on January 24, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 24, 2017
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
2860 1184/14 -4137

[*1]In re Calvin Brooks, Petitioner,

v

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., et al., Respondent.

Calvin Brooks, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. Ellen Biben, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 24, 2017

CLERK