Matter of Moore v Departmental Disciplinary Comm.
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 22, 2016
Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Webber, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
2541 79/16 -5539
[*1]In re Teddy Moore, Petitioner,
v
Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Supreme Court, Appellate Division First Judicial Department, Respondent.
Teddy Moore, petitioner pro se.
John W. McConnell, New York State Office of Court Administration, New York (Lee A. Adlerstein of counsel), for respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 22, 2016
DEPUTY CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.