Matter of Harris v New York City Police Dept.
Annotate this CaseDecided on October 6, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
15785 401861/13
[*1] In re Fred Harris, [M-2426] Petitioner,
v
New York City Police Department, et al., Respondents.
Fred Harris, petitioner pro se.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for New York City Police Department, respondent.
Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Maria Park of counsel), for Kellie Muse, respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 6, 2015
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.