Nyadzi v Lee

Annotate this Case
Nyadzi v Lee 2015 NY Slip Op 05614 Decided on June 30, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 30, 2015
Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Moskowitz, Clark, JJ.
15571N 306871/12

[*1] Tina Love Nyadzi, Plaintiff-Appellant, —

v

Ki Chul Lee, et al., Defendants-Respondents.



Dubow, Smith & Marothy, Bronx (Steven J. Mines of counsel), for appellant.

Raven & Kolbe, LLP, New York (Michael T. Gleason of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered December 4, 2014, which denied plaintiff's motion to strike the answer of defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to strike the answer of defendants, as there was no discovery violation (see CPLR 3126; Fish & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler, 75 AD3d 219, 220 [1st Dept 2010]). The court's (Laura Douglas, J.), order entered August 14, 2014, which is not on appeal here, directed defendants to produce "Mr. Roderick Roberts on behalf of defendant Ki Chul Lee," and superseded the two prior conference orders directing "all parties" to appear for depositions. Defendants complied with the order entered August 14, 2014.

Further, defense counsel acted properly during the deposition of defendant 3420 Boston Road Corp.'s owner.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 30, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.