Casiano v Start El., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Casiano v Start El., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 02436 Decided on March 24, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 24, 2015
Tom, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels, Clark, JJ.
14621N 300973/09

[*1] Wilton Casiano, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Start Elevator, Inc., Defendant-Respondent, Tuck-It-Away, Inc., Defendant. [And a Third-Party Action]



Dubow, Smith & Marothy, Bronx (Steven J. Mines of counsel), for appellant.

Gallo, Vitucci & Klar, LLP, New York (Kimberly A. Ricciardi of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered July 24, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Start Elevator, Inc. to comply with discovery requests, and granted Start a protective order with respect to the requested discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that, in the course of his employment by third-party defendant, he injured his hand in a freight elevator maintained by defendant Start, because the elevator was not equipped with strap handles. Plaintiff seeks documents concerning the post-accident installation of strap handles in the elevator.

As Start was retained by plaintiff's employer, the lessor of the premises, pursuant to a maintenance contract denominated a "Lubrication Agreement," there are no issues as to control or maintenance of the elevator with respect to which evidence of post-accident repairs to the elevator would be material and necessary (see Steinel v 131/93 Owners Corp. , 240 AD2d 301 [*2][1st Dept 1997]). Nor is there an issue as to the condition of the elevator and its lack of straps at the time of the accident, and no claim of design defect is asserted (see id. ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 24, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.