Pupiales v BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc.

Annotate this Case
Pupiales v BLDG Mgt. Co., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 01988 Decided on March 12, 2015 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 12, 2015
Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Richter, Kapnick, JJ.
14490N 158098/12

[*1] Doris Pupiales, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

BLDG Management Co., Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.



David J. Hernandez & Associates, Brooklyn (David J. Hernandez of counsel), for appellant.

Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York (Joel L. Finger of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered on or about January 22, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants' motion to compel arbitration and to stay this action pending arbitration proceedings, and denied plaintiff's motion for an order compelling defendant Rishi Patraju to submit to oral swab DNA testing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff waived any objection to arbitration in light of her union's commencement of the arbitration proceedings on her behalf (see Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson] , 8 NY2d 377, 382-383 [1960]; Matter of RRN Assoc. [DAK Elec. Contr. Corp.] , 224 AD2d 250 [1st Dept 1996]).

In light of its order compelling arbitration, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's application to compel DNA testing of Patraju.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 12, 2015

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.