People v Huggins

Annotate this Case
People v Huggins 2013 NY Slip Op 08021 Decided on December 3, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 3, 2013
Andrias, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
11221 3178/11

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Phillip Huggins, Defendant-Appellant.




Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Allen Fallek
of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Nicole
Coviello of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J. at suppression hearing; Thomas Farber, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence. An officer saw defendant engaging in conduct that reasonably appeared to be robbery, rather than horseplay as defendant now suggests. Accordingly, the officer had probable cause for an arrest, which does not require exclusion of all hypotheses of innocence (see e.g. People v Lewis, 50 AD3d 595 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 790 [2008]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 3, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.