Hochmuller v Bellwest Mgt. Corp.
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 19, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Gische, JJ.
11099 103397/12
[*1]Barbara Kulig Hochmuller, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
Bellwest Management Corporation, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Barbara Kulig Hochmuller, appellant pro se.
James R. Pigott, Jr., New York, for respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered October 5, 2012, which denied plaintiff's motion for a stay of Housing Court proceedings and for the court to recuse itself, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly declined to stay proceedings in Housing Court. As noted by the motion court, plaintiff had it within her power to avoid any eviction proceedings by executing a renewal lease for her studio apartment and then pursue her request to be relocated to a renovated one-bedroom apartment in the subject building.
The court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to recuse itself (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403 [1987]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 19, 2013
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.