Cangro v Rosado

Cangro v Rosado 2013 NY Slip Op 07271 Decided on November 7, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 7, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Richter, Feinman, JJ.
10972 104562/10

[*1]Jennifer Cangro, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Mary . Rosado, Defendant-Respondent.




Jennifer Cangro, appellant pro se.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 9, 2012, which denied plaintiff's motion for reargument of the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper. Plaintiff is enjoined from commencing any litigation or making any motions against defendant without the prior permission of the appropriate administrative judge.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (D'Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2010]).

In light of plaintiff's extraordinary history of frivolous and abusive litigation, including this meritless action against her former guardian (see e.g. Cangro v Cangro, 288 AD2d 417 [2d Dept 2001]; Cangro v Solomon, 2010 NY Slip Op 31980U [Sup Ct NY County 2010], vacatur denied 2011 NY Slip Op 87844U [1st Dept 2011], appeal dismissed, lv dismissed 19 NY3d 990 [2012]), plaintiff is restrained from commencing further proceedings against her without prior judicial permission.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 7, 2013

CLERK