Franco v 172 E Holdings LLC

Annotate this Case
Franco v 172 E Holdings LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 07120 Decided on October 31, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 31, 2013
Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Feinman, Gische, JJ.
10922 103991/12

[*1]Sergio Franco, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

172 E Holdings LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants.




Law Offices of Allison M. Furman, P.C., New York (Allison M.
Furman of counsel), for appellants.
Pedowitz & Meister, LLP, New York (Marisa Warren of
counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered February 1, 2013, which granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, and set an undertaking in the nominal amount of $100, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm if the relief were not granted, and that the equities weigh in his favor (see Nobu Next Door, LLC v Fine Arts Hous., Inc., 4 NY3d 839 [2005]). The amount of the required undertaking is appropriate (see Pouncy v Dudley, 27 AD3d 633, 635 [2d Dept 2006]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 31, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.