People v McCullough

Annotate this Case
People v McCullough 2012 NY Slip Op 08253 Decided on December 4, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 4, 2012
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman, JJ.
8690 519/09

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Natasha McCullough, Defendant-Appellant.




Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (David Crow
of counsel), and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York
(Hiral D. Mehta of counsel), for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Orrie A. Levy of
counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Caesar Cirigliano, J.), rendered May 24, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of six months, concurrent with five years' probation, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).

Defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The jury could have reasonably inferred that when defendant kicked the victim she did so with intent to cause serious physical injury. That inference was supported by the totality of defendant's violent and threatening conduct toward the victim, not limited to the moment of the kick. The testimony of the victim and her surgeon established that the kick caused the victim's disabling injury (see generally Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 280-281 [1984]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 4, 2012

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.