Matter of Autumn P. (Justin P.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Autumn P. (Justin P.) 2012 NY Slip Op 01740 Decided on March 8, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 8, 2012
Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Moskowitz, Román, JJ.
7026

[*1]In re Autumn P., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc.,

and

Justin P., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.




Carol Kahn, New York, for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan B.
Eisner of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane
Pazar of counsel), attorney for the child.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about February 16, 2011, which, inter alia, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent father neglected and abused the subject child, placed the child in the custody and guardianship of the Commissioner of Social Services until completion of the next scheduled permanency hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings that the father neglected and abused his daughter were supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 1012[e],[f]; § 1046[b][i]). The medical evidence showed that the six-month old infant had sustained three leg fractures, a subdural hematoma and a cut to her mouth. The parents offered no explanation for the majority of the injuries. Petitioner demonstrated that the child's pattern of serious and unexplained injuries would ordinarily not occur absent acts or omissions of the parents, and that the father was the [*2]child's primary caretaker when the injuries occurred (see Matter of Philip M., 82 NY2d 238, 243-244 [1993]).

We have considered the father's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 8, 2012

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.