Raynier v 159 Eluji Assoc., LLC
Annotate this CaseDecided on February 28, 2012
Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6929 111901/09
[*1]Laara Raynier, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
159 Eluji Associates, LLC, Defendant-Respondent.
Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Metz of
counsel), for appellant.
Roger D. Olson, New York, for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered July 1, 2011, which, upon converting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 to one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, granted defendant's motion and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court correctly determined that neither Real Property Law § 234 nor the plain terms of the lease provided for recovery of attorneys' fees incurred as a result of an administrative application before the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (see e.g. Matter of Chessin v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 100 AD2d 297, 305-306 [1984]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: FEBRUARY 28, 2012
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.