People v Padilla

Annotate this Case
People v Padilla 2012 NY Slip Op 01126 Decided on February 14, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 14, 2012
Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
6803 653/06

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Richard Padilla, Defendant-Appellant.




Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New
York (Risa Gerson of counsel), for appellant.
Richard Padilla, appellant pro se.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David E.A.
Crowley of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered on or about February 1, 2007,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 14, 2012

CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.