Matter of Jiminez v Schneiderman
Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Jiminez v Schneiderman
2012 NY Slip Op 00656
Decided on January 31, 2012
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on January 31, 2012
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6667 4852/09 -4809
[*1]In re Mary Jiminez, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, etc., et al., Respondents.
Denis Patrick Kelleher, PLLC, New York (Denis Patrick
Kelleher of counsel), for petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jodi A.
Danzig of counsel), for Attorney General, respondent.
Decided on January 31, 2012
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6667 4852/09 -4809
[*1]In re Mary Jiminez, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, etc., et al., Respondents.
Denis Patrick Kelleher, PLLC, New York (Denis Patrick
Kelleher of counsel), for petitioner.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jodi A.
Danzig of counsel), for Attorney General, respondent.
Application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
