People v Brown

Annotate this Case
People v Brown 2011 NY Slip Op 09196 Decided on December 20, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.





Decided on December 20, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Acosta, JJ.



6401 4181/03


[*1]The People of the State of New York,

Respondent,

-against-


v

Victor Brown,

Defendant-Appellant.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Hannah E. C. Moore of counsel), for respondent.

Judgement, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy K. Webber, J. at speedy trial motion; Martin Marcus, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered February 23, 2009, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

To the extent that the record on appeal permits review, defendant has not established a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]). There was a 40-month delay and defendant was incarcerated for approximately half of that time. However, the People have satisfactorily explained the delay, most of which was attributable to the unavailability of an important witness (see e.g. People v Cruz, 293 AD2d 412 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 674 [2002]). In addition, the charges were very serious, and defendant's claim of prejudice is unpersuasive.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, in a colloquy with the court as well as in writing (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]). That waiver forecloses review of defendant's contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive. As an alternative holding, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 20, 2011

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.