Matter of Jabari I.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jabari I. 2011 NY Slip Op 08982 Decided on December 13, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 13, 2011
Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Renwick, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
6314

[*1]In re Jabari I., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Presentment Agency


Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elana
E. Roffman of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Marta
Ross of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about February 28, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the third degree, and placed him on supervised probation for a period of 18 months with mandatory sex offender counseling, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

The then-13-year-old complainant testified that the then-13-year-old appellant made rude sexual comments and gave her a quick slap on her buttocks in a classroom in which other students and their teacher were all present. Even if fully credited, this evidence was legally insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant performed this highly offensive behavior "for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire" (Penal Law § 130.00[3]; see Matter of Shamar D., 84 AD3d 605 [2011]; Matter of Keenan O., 273 AD2d 167 [2000]).

Regardless of whether the evidence was legally sufficient, we also conclude that the court's finding was against the weight of the evidence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 13, 2011

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.