People v Velez
Annotate this Case
People v Velez
2011 NY Slip Op 07702
Decided on November 1, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 1, 2011
Friedman, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
5879 160/04
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jaime Velez, Defendant-Appellant.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler
of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on November 1, 2011
Friedman, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
5879 160/04
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Jaime Velez, Defendant-Appellant.
Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler
of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered November 13, 2008, resentencing defendant to a term of 5 years, with 5 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: NOVEMBER 1, 2011
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
