People v Stroud
Annotate this Case
People v Stroud 2011 NY Slip Op 06530 Decided on September 22, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 22, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
3377/02 5547
[*1]5546-People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Michael Stroud, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on September 22, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
3377/02 5547
[*1]5546-People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Michael Stroud, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered March 6, 2009, resentencing defendant to a term of 10 years, with 5 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2011
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
