Roberts v Paterson

Roberts v Paterson 2011 NY Slip Op 04380 Decided on May 26, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 26, 2011
Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Friedman, Catterson, Richter, JJ.
5317N 116602/10

[*1]Lillian Roberts, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v

David A. Paterson, etc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.



 
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York (Ernst H.
Rosenberger of counsel), for appellants.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Laura R.
Johnson of counsel), for David A. Paterson, respondent.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn
Rootenberg of counsel), for municipal respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 19, 2011, denying plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction requiring defendants to fund health insurance benefits for retirees of the New York City Off-Track Betting Corporation (NYC OTB) pending determination of plaintiffs' plenary action for the same relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The City and the State are precluded by the NY Constitution, article X, § 5, and Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law § 614 from assuming the legal obligation to pay the NYC OTB retirees' health insurance benefits. Thus, plaintiffs cannot show a probability of success on the merits or otherwise meet the "heightened standard" governing their application for a mandatory preliminary injunction (see Second on Second Café, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264, 273 [2009]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 26, 2011

CLERK