Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Zouhier B.

Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Zouhier B. 2011 NY Slip Op 03662 Decided on May 3, 2011 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 3, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Freedman, Richter, JJ.
4939

[*1]In re Commissioner of Social Services, etc., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

Zouhier B., Respondent-Appellant.



 
Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York
(Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2010, which confirmed the support magistrate's March 24, 2010 order finding that respondent willfully violated the court's December 5, 2007 support order, and placed respondent on probation for 6 months, upon certain terms and conditions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent's claim that he was not afforded a hearing as mandated by Family Court Act § 454 is unpreserved and thus is not properly before this Court (see e.g. Matter of Lindsey BB. (Ruth B.B.), 72 AD3d 1162, 1164 [2010]; Matter of Brittni K., 297 AD2d 236, 240 [2002]). In any event, respondent participated in the hearing before the magistrate and thus waived this claim (see Matter of Nilda S. v Dawn K., 302 AD2d 237, 238 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 512 [2003]). Significantly, respondent was represented by counsel, who argued on his behalf at the hearing before the magistrate, and presented evidence to the magistrate. Thus, respondent was afforded a full and fair hearing, and was given the opportunity to submit evidence in his defense.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 3, 2011

CLERK