Costal Nejapa, LTD v Crystal Power Co., LTD

Annotate this Case
Costal Nejapa, Ltd. v Crystal Power Co., Ltd. 2010 NY Slip Op 07988 [78 AD3d 435] November 9, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Costal Nejapa, Ltd., Respondent,
v
Crystal Power Company, Ltd., Appellant, and Banco Agricola et al., Respondents.

—[*1] McLaughlin & Stern, LLP, New York (Jon Paul Robbins of counsel), for appellant.

Andrews Kurth LLP, New York (Joseph A. Patella of counsel), for Costal Nejapa, Ltd., respondent.

Mark C.H. Mandell, Annandale, N.J., for Banco respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered December 11, 2009, discharging plaintiff from any liability to defendant-appellant Crystal Power Company and defendants-respondents Banco Agricola, Banco Salvadoreno and Banco G & T Continental El Salvador, S.A. in this interpleader action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 27, 2009, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Appellant's counsel negotiated and agreed to the order and the precise language that was incorporated into the appealed-from judgment. The fact that the language of the judgment to which appellant agreed has had negative consequences for it in another case in Texas state court is not a basis to set aside the judgment (see Charlop v A.O. Smith Water Prods., 64 AD3d 486, 486 [2009] [absent "fraud, mistake, collusion, (or) accident" judgment on consent will not be vacated]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Richter and RomÁn, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.