Matter of Crowe v Kelly

Annotate this Case
Matter of Crowe v Kelly 2010 NY Slip Op 07590 [77 AD3d 556] October 26, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

In the Matter of Kieran Crowe, Petitioner,
v
Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Rae Downes Koshetz, New York, for petitioner. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ellen Ravitch of counsel), for respondents.

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated July 22, 2008, finding petitioner guilty of sexual harassment and other misconduct and imposing a penalty of one year of dismissal, probation and suspension from duty without pay for 60 days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered May 26, 2009) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence of record supports the findings of the hearing officer. There is no basis to disturb the hearing officer's rejection of petitioner's explanations for his actions, or the hearing officer's credibility determinations (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).

We have considered the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.