People v Matos

Annotate this Case
People v Matos 2010 NY Slip Op 07240 [77 AD3d 450] October 12, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Victor Matos, Appellant.

—[*1] Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Matthew C. Williams of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered September 22, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly received a switchblade knife in evidence. The officer testified that it was the same knife he recovered from defendant and that it was in the same condition as it was when he recovered it. This was a sufficient foundation for admission of this nonfungible item (see generally People v Connelly, 35 NY2d 171, 174 [1974]); in any event, the People also established a proper chain of custody. Defendant's suggestion that, by placing a piece of tape on the knife and then removing it the officer may have somehow rendered an inoperable switchblade knife operable is highly speculative. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and RomÁn, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.