People v Malo

Annotate this Case
People v Malo 2010 NY Slip Op 06766 [76 AD3d 938] September 30, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, October 27, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Miguel Malo, Appellant.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Catherine M. Bartlett, J.), rendered October 24, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the third degree and disorderly conduct, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of three years' probation, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenges to the legal sufficiency of the evidence are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant acted recklessly, and that he caused physical injury to the victim (see People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]).

Defendant's claim that the prosecutor improperly cross-examined him is without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.