People v Acosta

Annotate this Case
People v Acosta 2010 NY Slip Op 05977 [75 AD3d 437] July 6, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 1, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Carmen Acosta, Appellant.

—[*1] Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Robert Budner of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael A. Gross, J.), rendered October 17, 2006, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of harassment in the second degree, and sentencing her to a conditional discharge with 10 days' community service and participation in an anger management program, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of alleged motives to falsify and inconsistencies in testimony, and its rejection of defendant's alibi defense. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.