Highbridge Advisory Council Family Servs., Inc. v Childcraft Educ. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Highbridge Advisory Council Family Servs., Inc. v Childcraft Educ. Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 05482 [74 AD3d 643] June 22, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Highbridge Advisory Council Family Services, Inc., Respondent,
v
Childcraft Education Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Roura & Melamed, Nonparty Respondent.

—[*1] Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (Richard A. Jacobsen of counsel), for Childcraft Education Corp., School Specialty, Inc, and Sportime, L.L.C., appellants. Stillman, Friedman & Shechtman, P.C., New York (Michael J. Grudberg of counsel), for Mitch Bonder, appellant. The Cochran Firm, New York (Rudyard F. Whyte of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), entered December 29, 2009, which denied the motion of defendants Childcraft Education, School Specialty and Sportime (collectively, Childcraft) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them and as to their counterclaims, and order, same court and Justice, entered November 4, 2009, which denied defendant Bonder's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him and for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from presettled order, same court and Justice, entered October 28, 2009, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as premature.

In this claim for rescission of contract, there were issues of fact as to allegedly fraudulent conduct with respect to the backdating of purchase orders in connection with plaintiff's purchase of certain educational materials from defendants (see Saint James' Episcopal Church v F.O.C.U.S. Found., 47 AD3d 1058 [2008]). In light of the disposition concerning the complaint, [*2]the Childcraft counterclaims are so interwoven that independent disposition is not appropriate at this time. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.