Matter of Aria E. (Daniel E.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Aria E. (Daniel E.) 2010 NY Slip Op 04034 [73 AD3d 489] May 11, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2010

In the Matter of Aria E., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Daniel E., Appellant; Administration for Children's Services, Respondent.

—[*1] Andrew J. Baer, New York, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ellen Ravitch of counsel), for respondent.

Adam M. Brown, Bronx, Law Guardian.

Amended order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about July 15, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, upon a fact-finding of neglect against respondent father, ordered respondent to comply with the terms of an order of protection, to complete a batterer's program, to attend parenting skills classes, to be evaluated for a sex offender's program, and to submit to a full mental health evaluation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent's challenge to the admission into evidence of the out-of-court statements made by the subject child's mother is unpreserved for appellate review (see Harris v Armstrong, 64 NY2d 700 [1984]). Were we to review the issue, we would find that the court properly relied on the mother's handwritten statement to the police, which statement respondent offered into evidence and the mother authenticated, concerning ongoing criminal activity by respondent in the home he shared with the child. In any event, the mother's hearing testimony that respondent was actively engaged in criminal activity in the home was sufficient alone to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the child's physical, mental or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a consequence of respondent's failure "to exercise a [*2]minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship" (Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.